<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jacob Hanson</title>
	<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com</link>
	<description>Business in the front, technology in the back.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Portfolio Project: GMNext.com</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2008/01/portfolio-project-gmnextcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2008/01/portfolio-project-gmnextcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 21:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Internet Applications (RIA)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2008/01/portfolio-project-gmnextcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>GM just launched a major new campaign called GMNext, to signify its 100th Anniversary. </p>
<blockquote><p>Over the next year, General Motors will celebrate the start of its second century through GMnext, a dialogue-based campaign that engages people via social media and interactive experiences. As a platform to showcase GM’s commitment to transportation solutions employing technologies that are relevant to consumer needs, GMnext will demonstrate our focus on solutions to the challenges that will shape the future of transportation. </p></blockquote>
<p>A huge team of talented professionals is responsible for GMNext.com and I was fortunate and excited to be part of it. I did the Flash piece top and center on the homepage of GMNext.com, with the 3D flying windows. Performance was crucial here, since each of the windows can be populated with a ton of dynamic content. The motion needed to be fluid and convincing and earlier attempts at producing the desired look and feel were not successful. I love to squeeze every last bit of performance out of my interactive projects and my capabilities were put to good use here.</p>
<p>Click the screenshot to visit the site:<br />
<a href="http://www.gmnext.com"><br />
<img src="http://www.jacobhanson.com/img/gm.jpg" alt="GMNext.com" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/industries/industrials/article/gm-asks-world-whats_423278_6.html" target="_new">Read More: GM Asks the World: &#8216;What&#8217;s Next?&#8217; (Fox Business)</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM just launched a major new campaign called GMNext, to signify its 100th Anniversary. </p>
<blockquote><p>Over the next year, General Motors will celebrate the start of its second century through GMnext, a dialogue-based campaign that engages people via social media and interactive experiences. As a platform to showcase GM’s commitment to transportation solutions employing technologies that are relevant to consumer needs, GMnext will demonstrate our focus on solutions to the challenges that will shape the future of transportation. </p></blockquote>
<p>A huge team of talented professionals is responsible for GMNext.com and I was fortunate and excited to be part of it. I did the Flash piece top and center on the homepage of GMNext.com, with the 3D flying windows. Performance was crucial here, since each of the windows can be populated with a ton of dynamic content. The motion needed to be fluid and convincing and earlier attempts at producing the desired look and feel were not successful. I love to squeeze every last bit of performance out of my interactive projects and my capabilities were put to good use here.</p>
<p>Click the screenshot to visit the site:<br />
<a href="http://www.gmnext.com"><br />
<img src="http://www.jacobhanson.com/img/gm.jpg" alt="GMNext.com" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/industries/industrials/article/gm-asks-world-whats_423278_6.html" target="_new">Read More: GM Asks the World: &#8216;What&#8217;s Next?&#8217; (Fox Business)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2008/01/portfolio-project-gmnextcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Reader is a bloated sack of crap</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/adobe-reader-is-a-bloated-sack-of-crap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/adobe-reader-is-a-bloated-sack-of-crap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/adobe-reader-is-a-bloated-sack-of-crap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I needed to view a PDF on a new machine today and, of course, I head over to Adobe to snag a copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader, or Adobe Reader, or whatever it's called today. Version 7 is out now, unbeknownst to be me, and Adobe has apparently invented more reasons to increase its version number, system requirements, download size, memory usage, and decrease everything desired: speed, ease-of-use, and simplicity. And I still don't use a single feature that I didn't have in Acrobat 4. I haven't been to Adobe's campus, yet--is it right next to the freeway? Whatever the case, there's got to be some seriously potent fumes running through their offices to explain the horrible trainwreck that Adobe Reader has become. 

In my typical, ever-so-slightly dramatic fashion, I typed in "Adobe Reader is a bloated sack of crap" in Google and found...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I needed to view a PDF on a new machine today and, of course, I head over to Adobe to snag a copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader, or Adobe Reader, or whatever it&#8217;s called today. Version 7 is out now, unbeknownst to be me, and Adobe has apparently invented more reasons to increase its version number, system requirements, download size, memory usage, and decrease everything desired: speed, ease-of-use, and simplicity. And I still don&#8217;t use a single feature that I didn&#8217;t have in Acrobat 4. I haven&#8217;t been to Adobe&#8217;s campus, yet&#8211;is it right next to the freeway? Whatever the case, there&#8217;s got to be some seriously potent fumes running through their offices to explain the horrible trainwreck that Adobe Reader has become. </p>
<p>In my typical, ever-so-slightly dramatic fashion, I typed in &#8220;Adobe Reader is a bloated sack of crap&#8221; in Google and found a host of sympathizers and recommendations. A kind commenter on this post over at <a href="http://west-wind.com/weblog/posts/1482.aspx">Rick Strahl&#8217;s blog</a> pointed the world to a free PDF reader called <a href="http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php">Foxit Reader</a>. Weighing in a whopping 1.6MB (compared to Adobe&#8217;s 20M&#8211;or 28MB depending on which option you select), Foxit Reader downloads in a blink of an eye and performs amazingly well. Suddenly, your Dual Core processor actually feels faster than your old Pentium 3 did with Acrobat Reader 5. Foxit is beating the pants off of Adobe with their own technology&#8230;badly. This is how is should be done, folks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/adobe-reader-is-a-bloated-sack-of-crap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hassle your users with captcha</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/hassle-your-users-with-captcha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/hassle-your-users-with-captcha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/hassle-your-users-with-captcha/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;m trying to find some decent <a href="http://www.utahjazz.com">Jazz tickets</a> the other day and I run into their <em>captcha</em> test. That&#8217;s &#8220;completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart&#8221;, of course. Unless you&#8217;re the programming-type, this will probably help: <img src="http://www.jacobhanson.com/img/captcha_ticketmaster.jpg" alt="ticketmaster captcha" /></p>
<p> Over the course of my visit to Ticketmaster, I probably fail the test 25% of the time. Me, the programming-type, with 20/20 vision, and an itch to buy some egregiously overpriced tickets. Sites add these tests to their submission forms to keep sneaky people from doing things in an automated fashion, like posting comment spam on blogs on a massive scale. That&#8217;s nice and all, but it has gotten out of control on some sites to the point where users are regularly failing these tests multiple times in a row. That&#8217;s a serious impediment to users who are trying to give you money. Ticketmaster execs, I&#8217;ll bet you a cup of Starbucks per day for the rest of your life: you are losing a measurable amount of revenue at your captcha test screen.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;m trying to find some decent <a href="http://www.utahjazz.com">Jazz tickets</a> the other day and I run into their <em>captcha</em> test. That&#8217;s &#8220;completely automated public Turing test to tell computers and humans apart&#8221;, of course. Unless you&#8217;re the programming-type, this will probably help: <img src="http://www.jacobhanson.com/img/captcha_ticketmaster.jpg" alt="ticketmaster captcha" /></p>
<p> Over the course of my visit to Ticketmaster, I probably fail the test 25% of the time. Me, the programming-type, with 20/20 vision, and an itch to buy some egregiously overpriced tickets. Sites add these tests to their submission forms to keep sneaky people from doing things in an automated fashion, like posting comment spam on blogs on a massive scale. That&#8217;s nice and all, but it has gotten out of control on some sites to the point where users are regularly failing these tests multiple times in a row. That&#8217;s a serious impediment to users who are trying to give you money. Ticketmaster execs, I&#8217;ll bet you a cup of Starbucks per day for the rest of your life: you are losing a measurable amount of revenue at your captcha test screen.  <a href="http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/hassle-your-users-with-captcha/#more-15" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2007/01/hassle-your-users-with-captcha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m learning in college</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/09/what-im-learning-in-college/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/09/what-im-learning-in-college/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 04:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/09/what-im-learning-in-college/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the middle of taking my third economics course, I&#8217;m (again) reminded of the fickleness of college courses. You&#8217;d think that the knowledge I&#8217;ve gained in other courses would be directly applicable to this one, wouldn&#8217;t you? But my third economics course from my third economics professor introduces yet another set of definitions for basic economics concepts. I know this stuff already. But, each professor wants you to regurgitate their particular interpretation of the concepts. There is little room for free thought and generalized empirical application. No&#8211;parroting a professor&#8217;s own  language seems to be the recipe for success. I know from experience that going with the flow will be the least-stressful path and will guarantee the best grade, but I feel like I&#8217;m doing a disservice to my brain by allowing it to simply act as a playback device for my professors.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the middle of taking my third economics course, I&#8217;m (again) reminded of the fickleness of college courses. You&#8217;d think that the knowledge I&#8217;ve gained in other courses would be directly applicable to this one, wouldn&#8217;t you? But my third economics course from my third economics professor introduces yet another set of definitions for basic economics concepts. I know this stuff already. But, each professor wants you to regurgitate their particular interpretation of the concepts. There is little room for free thought and generalized empirical application. No&#8211;parroting a professor&#8217;s own  language seems to be the recipe for success. I know from experience that going with the flow will be the least-stressful path and will guarantee the best grade, but I feel like I&#8217;m doing a disservice to my brain by allowing it to simply act as a playback device for my professors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/09/what-im-learning-in-college/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/05/failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/05/failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 04:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/05/failure/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about failure lately. Given that each of us has finite energy each day, I wondered how much of it I expend avoiding failure. The answer is a lot. This has had the deliberate effect of causing more successes than failures at the end of the day. But it&#8217;s also had a tremendously negative effect. All of the effort to avoid failure has caused cautiousness, hesitancy, and even avoidance. Risk aversion.</p>
<p><em>One of the reasons people stop learning is that they become less and less<br />
willing to risk failure. - John W. Gardner</em></p>
<p>Mmmhmm. Failure is simply feedback&#8211;so you can get your ass up and try smarter next time. Failure is education and must be treated as such. The only <strong>real</strong> failure is if you stop trying. Once again I&#8217;m reminded that <strong>action is everything</strong>. And just to remind myself: <strong>Think less, do more.</strong> Here&#8217;s a couple more pertinent quotes:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;A life which does not go into action is a failure.&#8221; - Arnold J. Toynbee </em></p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t consider losses a waste of time.  Consider them an apprenticeship. - Greg<br />
Norman </em></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about failure lately. Given that each of us has finite energy each day, I wondered how much of it I expend avoiding failure. The answer is a lot. This has had the deliberate effect of causing more successes than failures at the end of the day. But it&#8217;s also had a tremendously negative effect. All of the effort to avoid failure has caused cautiousness, hesitancy, and even avoidance. Risk aversion.</p>
<p><em>One of the reasons people stop learning is that they become less and less<br />
willing to risk failure. - John W. Gardner</em></p>
<p>Mmmhmm. Failure is simply feedback&#8211;so you can get your ass up and try smarter next time. Failure is education and must be treated as such. The only <strong>real</strong> failure is if you stop trying. Once again I&#8217;m reminded that <strong>action is everything</strong>. And just to remind myself: <strong>Think less, do more.</strong> Here&#8217;s a couple more pertinent quotes:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;A life which does not go into action is a failure.&#8221; - Arnold J. Toynbee </em></p>
<p><em>Don&#8217;t consider losses a waste of time.  Consider them an apprenticeship. - Greg<br />
Norman </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/05/failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why AJAX sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/03/why-ajax-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/03/why-ajax-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 03:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/03/why-ajax-sucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, ok, so the title is a bit strong. The truth is, I think everything sucks to some extent. And I should mention that I&#8217;m a long-time Flash <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Internet_Application">RIA (Rich Internet Application)</a> developer. Now that we have that out of the way, I still think AJAX is pretty cool. I thought it was even before some bastard gave it a buzzword and it was still called DHTML and XMLHttpRequest circa 1999. <img src='http://www.jacobhanson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> My complaints with it then pretty much stand today. I hate Javascript. Not the language, necessarily, but the implementations of it. A huge problem is cross-browser differences. I should not have to write script to accomodate implementation differences between browsers. One of the reasons I love Flash is because the same code runs the same way in any Flash player (*keep your esoteric exceptions to yourself).</p>
<p>Another huge problem has been error handling (less so since Javascript >= 1.5, which is included with the latest mainstream browsers). If your Javascript breaks for some reason, all the user gets is a little non-descript icon in some corner of their browser and the rest of your script stops working. They don&#8217;t notice it. Hell, I hardly notice and I&#8217;m usually looking for it. And depending on how much your application relies on Javascript, the user could end up with a blank, incomplete, and/or unusable user interface. That is an utter nightmare for serious applications, one I suffered with a lot when I was developing a prototype of my early-draft SCORM-based Learning Management System (LMS) a few years ago. It was 7-8K lines of Javascript at that point. And there were all sorts of gremlins that kept it from being as stable as we needed it, despite proper coding practices and numerous workarounds to keep things from flaking out. Ultimately, we scrapped that and re-wrote it mostly in Flash, where it proceeded to kick an enormous amount of ass. Honestly, there should be a standard, uniform, no-brains-required way to catch and report errors back to the server and handle them gracefully on the client.</p>
<p>Third, and this comes mostly from spite, although the point is still wholely valid: The same people that complained about HTML frames and those who complained Flash not being SEO-friendly, back button-friendly, or accessibility-friendly (nevermind being a proprietary product of an evil corporation) should be complaining about AJAX. Many of those same issues, which I agree with to a certain extent, still apply to AJAX as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;AJAX&#8221; is being hyped (along with its equally <a href="http://isd.usc.edu/~karl/Bingo/">Buzzword Bingo-worthy</a> illegitimate lovechild &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;) as being some sort of magical panacea. It&#8217;s not, by any stretch of any imagination. But, like with XML in the late 90&#8217;s, we&#8217;re going to see AJAX is every web-related job description known to man, whether it&#8217;s appropriate, legal, or congruant with the laws of nature. All of that being said, it is pretty cool to be updating parts of your page dynamically that would otherwise require full page refreshes&#8230;and I&#8217;m using it on a few projects. <img src='http://www.jacobhanson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, ok, so the title is a bit strong. The truth is, I think everything sucks to some extent. And I should mention that I&#8217;m a long-time Flash <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Internet_Application">RIA (Rich Internet Application)</a> developer. Now that we have that out of the way, I still think AJAX is pretty cool. I thought it was even before some bastard gave it a buzzword and it was still called DHTML and XMLHttpRequest circa 1999. <img src='http://www.jacobhanson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> My complaints with it then pretty much stand today. I hate Javascript. Not the language, necessarily, but the implementations of it. A huge problem is cross-browser differences. I should not have to write script to accomodate implementation differences between browsers. One of the reasons I love Flash is because the same code runs the same way in any Flash player (*keep your esoteric exceptions to yourself).</p>
<p>Another huge problem has been error handling (less so since Javascript >= 1.5, which is included with the latest mainstream browsers). If your Javascript breaks for some reason, all the user gets is a little non-descript icon in some corner of their browser and the rest of your script stops working. They don&#8217;t notice it. Hell, I hardly notice and I&#8217;m usually looking for it. And depending on how much your application relies on Javascript, the user could end up with a blank, incomplete, and/or unusable user interface. That is an utter nightmare for serious applications, one I suffered with a lot when I was developing a prototype of my early-draft SCORM-based Learning Management System (LMS) a few years ago. It was 7-8K lines of Javascript at that point. And there were all sorts of gremlins that kept it from being as stable as we needed it, despite proper coding practices and numerous workarounds to keep things from flaking out. Ultimately, we scrapped that and re-wrote it mostly in Flash, where it proceeded to kick an enormous amount of ass. Honestly, there should be a standard, uniform, no-brains-required way to catch and report errors back to the server and handle them gracefully on the client.</p>
<p>Third, and this comes mostly from spite, although the point is still wholely valid: The same people that complained about HTML frames and those who complained Flash not being SEO-friendly, back button-friendly, or accessibility-friendly (nevermind being a proprietary product of an evil corporation) should be complaining about AJAX. Many of those same issues, which I agree with to a certain extent, still apply to AJAX as well.</p>
<p>&#8220;AJAX&#8221; is being hyped (along with its equally <a href="http://isd.usc.edu/~karl/Bingo/">Buzzword Bingo-worthy</a> illegitimate lovechild &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243;) as being some sort of magical panacea. It&#8217;s not, by any stretch of any imagination. But, like with XML in the late 90&#8217;s, we&#8217;re going to see AJAX is every web-related job description known to man, whether it&#8217;s appropriate, legal, or congruant with the laws of nature. All of that being said, it is pretty cool to be updating parts of your page dynamically that would otherwise require full page refreshes&#8230;and I&#8217;m using it on a few projects. <img src='http://www.jacobhanson.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/03/why-ajax-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More innovation, less imitation.</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/more-innovation-less-imitation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/more-innovation-less-imitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/more-innovation-less-imitation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love him or hate him, Bob Parsons is an interesting guy. I was browsing his blog last night and caught an old post of his about Sony (<a href="http://www.bobparsons.com/HowSONYgottobegreatTheirphilosophywillenergizeanybusinessIuseitatGoDaddyItwillalsoworkforyou.html">How Sony Got to be Great</a>). He quotes Sony co-founder Masura Ibuka who said, “You never succeed in technology, business or anything by following the others.” I love this concept. Not that it should be your only modus operandi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love him or hate him, Bob Parsons is an interesting guy. I was browsing his blog last night and caught an old post of his about Sony (<a href="http://www.bobparsons.com/HowSONYgottobegreatTheirphilosophywillenergizeanybusinessIuseitatGoDaddyItwillalsoworkforyou.html">How Sony Got to be Great</a>). He quotes Sony co-founder Masura Ibuka who said, “You never succeed in technology, business or anything by following the others.” I love this concept. Not that it should be your only modus operandi, but it counter-balances the tendency to try and stay up on every little thing happening in your markets and paying acute attention to your competition. More innovation, less imitation. </p>
<p>I read this post and thought about Van Halen (of course!). I&#8217;ve heard that Eddie Van Halen doesn&#8217;t listen to other people&#8217;s music much and certainly not for inspiration. I heard this from a critic who was whining about how Van Halen sounds the same after x number of albums. The beauty of this is that Van Halen sounds like Van Halen and nobody else. It wouldn&#8217;t be the same if the guys had tried to imitate Led Zeppelin. Van Halen would be a watered-down copy of the original like so many grunge bands where in 1993.</p>
<p>Bob then goes on and talks about how he has applied the principle inside of GoDaddy. From a IT standpoint, a lot of times it&#8217;s easier to just use whatever solutions are hot this month, especially where open-source is as prevalent as it is. But, sometimes is makes a lot more sense for your individual firm to go your own way. This was certainly the case at <a href="http://www.firsthealth.com">First Health</a>, where I developed a Learning Management System for e-learning across the enterprise. There were numerous solutions commercially available. But we had a pretty clear vision of what we wanted and the other solutions were essential square pegs for a round hole. So, we went our own way, developed our own system, and in the end, there was nothing like us around. We offered a uniquely rich and interactive form of online training and our users loved it, after being subjected to the common, dry, &#8216;page-turner&#8217; stuff for so long.</p>
<p>Also, it makes me think about market evaluation. I personally get caught up a lot in thinking about potential markets and their viability. The thing is, a lot of entrepreneurs I know didn&#8217;t spend a lot of time thinking if the market was truly a good opportunity for them or not. They just got to work. Skip the analysis paralysis. Action first, <a href="http://blog.guykawasaki.com/">Guy Kawasaki-style</a>. Of course, I don&#8217;t advocate reckless enterprising, but it&#8217;s a great counter-balance to getting caught up in details and information that doesn&#8217;t necessarily (have to) matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/more-innovation-less-imitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Routine</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/new-routine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/new-routine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Health / Fitness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/new-routine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two weeks ago I started a new weightlifting routine:

day 1 - light

   1. squat 3 sets x 15 reps
   2. power shrug (pull) 3 x 5 using light weight
   3. shoulder press (push) 3 x 15
   4. calf raise 3 x 15
   5. ab crunches or swissball crunches 3 x 20

day 2 - heavy...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago I started a new weightlifting routine:</p>
<p>day 1 - light</p>
<p>   1. squat 3 sets x 15 reps<br />
   2. power shrug (pull) 3 x 5 using light weight<br />
   3. shoulder press (push) 3 x 15<br />
   4. calf raise 3 x 15<br />
   5. ab crunches or swissball crunches 3 x 20</p>
<p>day 2 - heavy<br />
<!-- more --><br />
   1. squat 3 x 5<br />
   2. bench press (push) 3 x 5<br />
   3. Pullups (assisted if necessary) or lat pulldowns (pull) 3 x 5</p>
<p>day 3 - medium</p>
<p>   1. squat 3 x 8<br />
   2. One-arm dumbbell row OR Seated cable row (pull) 3 x 8<br />
   3. Dips or Incline bench press (push) 3 x 8<br />
   4. Back hyperextensions (good mornings) 3 x 8</p>
<p>This is much different than the one I&#8217;ve been doing for a couple years (on and off). The old one was adapted from various routines I read about on <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/misc.fitness.weights">MFW</a>. It was informal,  I did what exercises I wanted to at the time. And tried to mix in some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIIT">HIIT</a> in between. It was a very inconsistent effort, but combined with an unrestrictive yet portion-controlled diet, I lost 40 pounds over two years and changed my body composition quite a bit, just not to the extent that I am after. </p>
<p>One thing that <em>always</em> plagued me on the old routine was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOMS">DOMs</a>. Typically, if I squatted, I would be in pain for 5-7 days and would be walking around like I was saddle sore. Same thing for bench presses. I was making gains, but sometimes the DOMS was bad enough that I had to pop a couple ibuprofen and it&#8217;s not really easy to get excited about going through that all over again when you&#8217;re deciding which exercises to do. I was also a bit of a glutton for punishment&#8211;when I did weight exercises, they would be heavy enough to cause failure roughly 90% of the way through the sets. Probably another mistake.</p>
<p>Contrast that with how the new routine is gone. The first time I did it, I did a Light day and probably went too heavy on the weight. The weight was quite a bit lower than what I usually do, but the reps were 15 instead of my typical < 10. I was hit with DOMS that didn&#8217;t fully clear up until a week later, mostly from squats. But, I was determined to make this work, so as soon as I could, I got back at it. I scaled the weight back again. The DOMs were minimal. Over the course of last week, I&#8217;ve progressively increased the weight up to my old numbers and beyond. There are some exercises that I haven&#8217;t had increases in for months that I&#8217;m now doing 20 or 30 pound over. And the best part, I&#8217;m not getting hardly any DOMs. Squatting three times a week is no problem. Sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/new-routine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Glory of Being an Entrepreneur</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/the-glory-of-being-an-entrepreneur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/the-glory-of-being-an-entrepreneur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Startups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/the-glory-of-being-an-entrepreneur/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember when I was 17 and I worked in the paint department at Ernst (think Home Depot). I'd get into these future-oriented conversations with a co-worker. He was older, maybe 2.5 times my age. We'd talk about starting our own businesses and he had a lot to say about it. It really got me thinking about actually doing it when I was older. This was one of the first times I remember really contemplating the idea. I've had some proclivities towards it.. Like in the 4th grade, I would assemble these little devices...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when I was 17 and I worked in the paint department at Ernst (think Home Depot). I&#8217;d get into these future-oriented conversations with a co-worker. He was older, maybe 2.5 times my age. We&#8217;d talk about starting our own businesses and he had a lot to say about it. It really got me thinking about actually doing it when I was older. This was one of the first times I remember really contemplating the idea. I&#8217;ve had some proclivities towards it.. Like in the 4th grade, I would assemble these little devices <a href="http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/the-glory-of-being-an-entrepreneur/#more-6" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/the-glory-of-being-an-entrepreneur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Me and Wal-mart</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jacobhanson.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>See, I have this thing with Wal-mart. We don&#8217;t get along. I hate it. Sure, hate is a strong word. But, when it comes to Wal-mart, it flows so easily whether I&#8217;m walking down one of their God-forsaken aisles or if I hear about their latest crime against society in the media. I hate the bottom-of-the-barrel product quality. I hate the raping of American businesses, the three of them that are left and are still able to supply Wal-mart, anyway. I hate the absence of that one thing&#8230;what is it&#8230;oh yeah: customer service.</p>
<p>Every single time I go, I regret it. Every time. I&#8217;ve given it several chances to redeem itself. I&#8217;ve even tried going during that 2-hour window of the week when there is more than one parking space available. But, it doesn&#8217;t work. It makes me feel dirty. And it&#8217;s of little consolation that I saved 18 cents on that bar of Zest I just bought, since I&#8217;m going to wear down half of it scrubbing off the stench of Wal-mart&#8217;s immorality. I&#8217;m much happier driving literally 5 miles right past the nearest Wal-mart to go to Target, a somewhat lesser evil. At least I can buy something that doesn&#8217;t suck there and the majority of my co-shoppers have showered in the past week. To commemorate my avoidance of Wal-mart, <a title="WalBtn" href="http://www.jacobhanson.com/walbtn">I&#8217;ve made a button you can use on your sites and blogs to show how many days it&#8217;s been since you set foot in a Wal-mart</a>.</p>
<p><div id="fo_targ_walbtn"></div>

<script type="text/javascript">

	var flashObject = new FlashObject("/walbtn.swf?d=2006-01-04&#038;col=444444","fm_walbtn","300","60","6","","","","","");
	flashObject.write("fo_targ_walbtn");

</script>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I have this thing with Wal-mart. We don&#8217;t get along. I hate it. Sure, hate is a strong word. But, when it comes to Wal-mart, it flows so easily whether I&#8217;m walking down one of their God-forsaken aisles or if I hear about their latest crime against society in the media. I hate the bottom-of-the-barrel product quality. I hate the raping of American businesses, the three of them that are left and are still able to supply Wal-mart, anyway. I hate the absence of that one thing&#8230;what is it&#8230;oh yeah: customer service.</p>
<p>Every single time I go, I regret it. Every time. I&#8217;ve given it several chances to redeem itself. I&#8217;ve even tried going during that 2-hour window of the week when there is more than one parking space available. But, it doesn&#8217;t work. It makes me feel dirty. And it&#8217;s of little consolation that I saved 18 cents on that bar of Zest I just bought, since I&#8217;m going to wear down half of it scrubbing off the stench of Wal-mart&#8217;s immorality. I&#8217;m much happier driving literally 5 miles right past the nearest Wal-mart to go to Target, a somewhat lesser evil. At least I can buy something that doesn&#8217;t suck there and the majority of my co-shoppers have showered in the past week. To commemorate my avoidance of Wal-mart, <a title="WalBtn" href="http://www.jacobhanson.com/walbtn">I&#8217;ve made a button you can use on your sites and blogs to show how many days it&#8217;s been since you set foot in a Wal-mart</a>.</p>
<p><div id="fo_targ_walbtn"></div>

<script type="text/javascript">

	var flashObject = new FlashObject("/walbtn.swf?d=2006-01-04&#038;col=444444","fm_walbtn","300","60","6","","","","","");
	flashObject.write("fo_targ_walbtn");

</script>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
