<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jacob Hanson</title>
	<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com</link>
	<description>Business in the front, technology in the back.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-111</link>
		<author>Joshua</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 06:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>The way Wal-mart treats its employees is not my only reason for disliking Wal-Mart.  They have been known to have negative effects on the environment and economy as well.  "How far can I push the bill" is pretty much their policy on business.

Also, while working at Wal-Mart IS, in fact, a choice, some people don't have any other choice.  You mention that most of the time this could be because of poor education and the inability to meet qualifications elsewhere.  This is true to an extent.  The economy of the state I live in isn't so good, especially that of the town where I live.  Why do we need two super Wal-Marts with in 10 minutes driving distance of each other?  I can tell you that the economy here hasn't improved much since they've been built.  And yes, it provides jobs initially, but there have been several small business that have gone out of business or moved since the first grand opening.  Not only does this take away our ability to buy from alternate vendors, but also jobs at these businesses.  And guarantee if they try applying somewhere else, wherever they apply aren't hiring, because that's just the way it is here.  

This is a great discussion and I do see points on both sides of the fence, but I still stand by my opinion that Wal-Mart needs to re-think their policies on many issues.

PS.  Thanks Mr. Walton(comment7).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way Wal-mart treats its employees is not my only reason for disliking Wal-Mart.  They have been known to have negative effects on the environment and economy as well.  &#8220;How far can I push the bill&#8221; is pretty much their policy on business.</p>
<p>Also, while working at Wal-Mart IS, in fact, a choice, some people don&#8217;t have any other choice.  You mention that most of the time this could be because of poor education and the inability to meet qualifications elsewhere.  This is true to an extent.  The economy of the state I live in isn&#8217;t so good, especially that of the town where I live.  Why do we need two super Wal-Marts with in 10 minutes driving distance of each other?  I can tell you that the economy here hasn&#8217;t improved much since they&#8217;ve been built.  And yes, it provides jobs initially, but there have been several small business that have gone out of business or moved since the first grand opening.  Not only does this take away our ability to buy from alternate vendors, but also jobs at these businesses.  And guarantee if they try applying somewhere else, wherever they apply aren&#8217;t hiring, because that&#8217;s just the way it is here.  </p>
<p>This is a great discussion and I do see points on both sides of the fence, but I still stand by my opinion that Wal-Mart needs to re-think their policies on many issues.</p>
<p>PS.  Thanks Mr. Walton(comment7).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failure by Tori</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/05/failure/#comment-106</link>
		<author>Tori</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/05/failure/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>You have the same name as my friend...cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have the same name as my friend&#8230;cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s time&#8230; by Gerald Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/its-time/#comment-67</link>
		<author>Gerald Hanson</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/its-time/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I see your reading lots of stimulating stuff!~  It's been a while since you have posted. Are ya still reading or have you moved on and up to other stuff??
 I think it is great to see you making it and being able to live the dream of so many people that would like to be free and not tied a a job.. This is great time in your life and I hope to understand , you only go around once so make the best of it, learn and feel, be happy someone may come into your life that will make it more complete and fun. Like getting married and having children. I know it is a thing to consider, so think about the clock ticking by and try no to let it go past where you want it to be. I' ll see ya later love ya Dad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see your reading lots of stimulating stuff!~  It&#8217;s been a while since you have posted. Are ya still reading or have you moved on and up to other stuff??<br />
 I think it is great to see you making it and being able to live the dream of so many people that would like to be free and not tied a a job.. This is great time in your life and I hope to understand , you only go around once so make the best of it, learn and feel, be happy someone may come into your life that will make it more complete and fun. Like getting married and having children. I know it is a thing to consider, so think about the clock ticking by and try no to let it go past where you want it to be. I&#8217; ll see ya later love ya Dad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why AJAX sucks by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/03/why-ajax-sucks/#comment-53</link>
		<author>Jeff</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/03/why-ajax-sucks/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I hate Javascript, too. &#60;option&#62;foo&#60;/option&#62; cost me a day (field.value returns "foo" for Firefox, and "" for MSIE).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate Javascript, too. &lt;option&gt;foo&lt;/option&gt; cost me a day (field.value returns &#8220;foo&#8221; for Firefox, and &#8220;&#8221; for MSIE).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-20</link>
		<author>Chris</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>It has been seven years since I shopped at Mal-Mart, I prefer to shop at local stores,or the internet and want or need for nothing, so it is possible, most don't have the willpower or economic ability to not shop there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been seven years since I shopped at Mal-Mart, I prefer to shop at local stores,or the internet and want or need for nothing, so it is possible, most don&#8217;t have the willpower or economic ability to not shop there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by CRC</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-19</link>
		<author>CRC</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 23:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I agree with people on both sides of the issue.

People should certainly have the agency to shop where they want. But the more I read up on the issues, the more uneasy I feel supporting national chains when I can purchase something similar... even if I must pay more for it.

I have noticed a small quiet trend that seems to be growing nationally. Consumer groups and local business owners are starting to create educational coops in cities and towns across the US. They promote "shop Local" campaigns to educate consumers about several of the problems with national chains, including how national chains suck the revenue out of local economies.

Some studies indicate that for every $100 spent at a locally owned business, $45 goes back into the community and its tax base. For every $100 spent at a national chain store, only $14 comes back into our local communities.

A study  commissioned by the Andersonville Development Corporation, found that locally owned businesses generate 70 percent more local economic impact per square foot than chain stores

Think long term, think local

http://www.specialoffersbulletinboard.org/shoplocal.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with people on both sides of the issue.</p>
<p>People should certainly have the agency to shop where they want. But the more I read up on the issues, the more uneasy I feel supporting national chains when I can purchase something similar&#8230; even if I must pay more for it.</p>
<p>I have noticed a small quiet trend that seems to be growing nationally. Consumer groups and local business owners are starting to create educational coops in cities and towns across the US. They promote &#8220;shop Local&#8221; campaigns to educate consumers about several of the problems with national chains, including how national chains suck the revenue out of local economies.</p>
<p>Some studies indicate that for every $100 spent at a locally owned business, $45 goes back into the community and its tax base. For every $100 spent at a national chain store, only $14 comes back into our local communities.</p>
<p>A study  commissioned by the Andersonville Development Corporation, found that locally owned businesses generate 70 percent more local economic impact per square foot than chain stores</p>
<p>Think long term, think local</p>
<p><a href="http://www.specialoffersbulletinboard.org/shoplocal.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.specialoffersbulletinboard.org/shoplocal.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-18</link>
		<author>Marie</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I think i have to agree with the comments made about C.H.O.I.C.E! That is what is so lovely about being an American... we have a choice and we all seem to forget that at times. Although I am not a fan of Wal-Mart, because of their inexpensive items, they are open and thriving. So good luck to those of you staying out of Wal-Mart. I bet it doesn't last very long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think i have to agree with the comments made about C.H.O.I.C.E! That is what is so lovely about being an American&#8230; we have a choice and we all seem to forget that at times. Although I am not a fan of Wal-Mart, because of their inexpensive items, they are open and thriving. So good luck to those of you staying out of Wal-Mart. I bet it doesn&#8217;t last very long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by garry</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-17</link>
		<author>garry</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Poor economy? Are you sure were talking about same country? Give me a break! The minimum wage is an artificial socialistic attempt to regulate wages. Why doesn't every business pay the minimum since that's all that's required? Because their just big-hearted? Baloni! Our economic system is great in that it tends to distribute wages according to the quality of the product that a business wants to produce. Businesses do not only compete for customers, they also compete for the quality and skill level of the pool of workers they need to produce the level of quality they are seeking. 

You give people no credit for using their brains to make choices. If they buy something at Wal-Mart and the value sucks for what they pay for that item, they will choose to do their shopping elsewhere. Choice is a good thing. The american consumers, with their dollars, made Wal-Mart the powerful giant that it is today. 

I did not say (nor would I ever) that minimally qualified workers are scum, those were your words. It is inevitable that our society will have these people in the workforce. It is a good thing that there are companies that can provide alot of these type jobs for folks that can't qualify for higher paying employment. 

The more the government stays out of the way of private business, the better. We have a system where the freedom and choice of the consumer and workforce would do a better job of regulating the marketplace than BIG BRO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor economy? Are you sure were talking about same country? Give me a break! The minimum wage is an artificial socialistic attempt to regulate wages. Why doesn&#8217;t every business pay the minimum since that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s required? Because their just big-hearted? Baloni! Our economic system is great in that it tends to distribute wages according to the quality of the product that a business wants to produce. Businesses do not only compete for customers, they also compete for the quality and skill level of the pool of workers they need to produce the level of quality they are seeking. </p>
<p>You give people no credit for using their brains to make choices. If they buy something at Wal-Mart and the value sucks for what they pay for that item, they will choose to do their shopping elsewhere. Choice is a good thing. The american consumers, with their dollars, made Wal-Mart the powerful giant that it is today. </p>
<p>I did not say (nor would I ever) that minimally qualified workers are scum, those were your words. It is inevitable that our society will have these people in the workforce. It is a good thing that there are companies that can provide alot of these type jobs for folks that can&#8217;t qualify for higher paying employment. </p>
<p>The more the government stays out of the way of private business, the better. We have a system where the freedom and choice of the consumer and workforce would do a better job of regulating the marketplace than BIG BRO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by David Wyly</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-16</link>
		<author>David Wyly</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 20:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Garry,

There's a reason that governments raise the minimum wage, as a capitalistic model tends to like shitting on the lower class.  Wal*Mart is an invasive business, killing local economies and caring more on business profit as opposed to taking care of their workers.

Yeah, I bet if someone could set up a sweatshop only paying $3 and hour, and if the statistics say that enough people are desperate enough for a job to fill the requisite positions, I'm sure it'd happen if it wasn't against the law.  That's Wal*Mart for you: The "How much can I get away with not paying my employees and still have the business run" model, and it's sick.

You pretend as-if people at Wal*Mart have the option to find a better-paying job... Either that or they're unqualified scum who don't deserve any better and are better working for practically free than being on welfare.  That's even more sick.

Wal*Mart, in order to save money, buys low-grade products (in bulk) and sells them for a high profit margin as if they were medium-grade products, except for slightly less.  This gives the illusion of "lower price," when in reality, Wally is making hand-over-fist with their barge-loads of chinese manufactured goods that Wally buys for practically nothing.

They have power through penetration.  Because they're so big, so consolidated and so convienient, people flock to them blindly (and eventually, they really don't have any other options as all the other competition somehow went out of business).

So, a business that crushes local economies, puts local stores out of business, drives the average pay-rate down, and preys on those who can't find a job because of our poor economy... You have yourself a real winner there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garry,</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason that governments raise the minimum wage, as a capitalistic model tends to like shitting on the lower class.  Wal*Mart is an invasive business, killing local economies and caring more on business profit as opposed to taking care of their workers.</p>
<p>Yeah, I bet if someone could set up a sweatshop only paying $3 and hour, and if the statistics say that enough people are desperate enough for a job to fill the requisite positions, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;d happen if it wasn&#8217;t against the law.  That&#8217;s Wal*Mart for you: The &#8220;How much can I get away with not paying my employees and still have the business run&#8221; model, and it&#8217;s sick.</p>
<p>You pretend as-if people at Wal*Mart have the option to find a better-paying job&#8230; Either that or they&#8217;re unqualified scum who don&#8217;t deserve any better and are better working for practically free than being on welfare.  That&#8217;s even more sick.</p>
<p>Wal*Mart, in order to save money, buys low-grade products (in bulk) and sells them for a high profit margin as if they were medium-grade products, except for slightly less.  This gives the illusion of &#8220;lower price,&#8221; when in reality, Wally is making hand-over-fist with their barge-loads of chinese manufactured goods that Wally buys for practically nothing.</p>
<p>They have power through penetration.  Because they&#8217;re so big, so consolidated and so convienient, people flock to them blindly (and eventually, they really don&#8217;t have any other options as all the other competition somehow went out of business).</p>
<p>So, a business that crushes local economies, puts local stores out of business, drives the average pay-rate down, and preys on those who can&#8217;t find a job because of our poor economy&#8230; You have yourself a real winner there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Me and Wal-mart by garry</title>
		<link>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-15</link>
		<author>garry</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jacobhanson.com/2006/02/me-and-wal-mart/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Josh, hate to break it to you, pal. But we still live in a country with lots of freedoms. Wal-Mart does not have some huge electromagnet that drags people in to work for them. People fill out applications just like anywhere else. They are perfectly free to find out what their wages and benefit package will be. And, they are perfectly free to say "no thanks, I'll go work at Targer or McDonalds". I left my last job because I wanted a better benefit package and they can do the same. Sorry but your argument is not an intelligent one. If enough people hate Wal-Mart and don't shop there, they will have to change things or go out of business. If they can't get people to work there because they treat their employees so bad, then they will have to change things or go out of business. It's really simple people. We live in a free market economy. We send the strongest message with our dollars. I don't mean to insult Wal-Mart employees, but many of them are minimally educated and these types of jobs are all the can qualify for. However, they are less of a burden on the welfare system/taxpayer by earning what income they can at Wal-Mart and in turn paying income tax on that income. Hey Paul, your friend must benefit from continuing to be a Wal-Mart vendor because he is still selling to them. You seem to have forgotten about a wonderful 6 letter word c-h-o-i-c-e. If your friend will suffer financially if he chooses to cease doing business with Wal-Mart, then he should market his product to other buyers. He must be benefitting from his business with them, even when they "turn the screws", otherwise he would tell them where to get off and find someone else to sell to. Let's use a little logic and thought when we formulate an argument. Sometimes we get upset and emotional about things and react without thinking things through.

Lovers of freedom= Good Americans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, hate to break it to you, pal. But we still live in a country with lots of freedoms. Wal-Mart does not have some huge electromagnet that drags people in to work for them. People fill out applications just like anywhere else. They are perfectly free to find out what their wages and benefit package will be. And, they are perfectly free to say &#8220;no thanks, I&#8217;ll go work at Targer or McDonalds&#8221;. I left my last job because I wanted a better benefit package and they can do the same. Sorry but your argument is not an intelligent one. If enough people hate Wal-Mart and don&#8217;t shop there, they will have to change things or go out of business. If they can&#8217;t get people to work there because they treat their employees so bad, then they will have to change things or go out of business. It&#8217;s really simple people. We live in a free market economy. We send the strongest message with our dollars. I don&#8217;t mean to insult Wal-Mart employees, but many of them are minimally educated and these types of jobs are all the can qualify for. However, they are less of a burden on the welfare system/taxpayer by earning what income they can at Wal-Mart and in turn paying income tax on that income. Hey Paul, your friend must benefit from continuing to be a Wal-Mart vendor because he is still selling to them. You seem to have forgotten about a wonderful 6 letter word c-h-o-i-c-e. If your friend will suffer financially if he chooses to cease doing business with Wal-Mart, then he should market his product to other buyers. He must be benefitting from his business with them, even when they &#8220;turn the screws&#8221;, otherwise he would tell them where to get off and find someone else to sell to. Let&#8217;s use a little logic and thought when we formulate an argument. Sometimes we get upset and emotional about things and react without thinking things through.</p>
<p>Lovers of freedom= Good Americans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
